
As brands grow from concept to shelf, one of the most important decisions they face is how to produce their product at scale. Two common options are co-packing and contract manufacturing—terms that are often used interchangeably, but actually represent different types of partnerships.
Understanding the distinction between co-packing vs contract manufacturing is essential for choosing the right approach for your business, especially in industries like food, beverage, beauty, and supplements. In this article, we’ll break down the differences, benefits, and how to decide which model best fits your brand.
Co-packing (short for contract packaging) is when a third-party company packages your already-developed product. In this model, you typically supply the formulation, ingredients, or base product, and the co-packer handles the assembly, such as filling bottles, labeling, shrink-wrapping, and palletizing for retail or eCommerce.
Co-packers are common in the food and beverage space, especially for items like sauces, snacks, or ready-to-drink beverages. Some co-packers may offer light manufacturing (like mixing or heating), but their core function is packaging.
Example: A startup kombucha brand might brew and ferment its product in-house or through another factory, then send it to a co-packer to bottle, label, and prepare it for retail.
Contract manufacturing is a broader and more involved service. In this model, a third-party manufacturer handles the full production process, including sourcing raw materials, producing the product from scratch, quality control, and packaging.
This is a turnkey solution for brands that don’t want to manage or own any part of the manufacturing process. Contract manufacturers often work with beauty, supplement, and CPG brands to bring fully developed products to life based on a client’s formulation or specification.
Example: A skincare startup provides a manufacturer with a custom formula for a moisturizer. The contract manufacturer then sources ingredients, blends the formula, fills the jars, labels the products, and ships them to distribution centers.
Feature | Co-Packing | Contract Manufacturing |
---|---|---|
Level of Involvement | Primarily packaging | Full product creation and packaging |
Who Provides Ingredients | Often the brand | Manufacturer usually sources |
Formulation Support | Rarely | Often available |
Best For | Brands with existing products needing scalable packaging | Brands seeking end-to-end production |
Customization | Moderate | High |
Common in | Food, beverage, supplements | Beauty, pharma, supplements, CPG |
Choose Co-Packing if:
Choose Contract Manufacturing if:
Some brands start with contract manufacturing for convenience, then transition to co-packing when they want more control or better margins. Others may use a contract manufacturer for their core product and a co-packer for special SKUs, seasonal bundles, or promotional packaging.
In many cases, using both is a smart strategic move. Brands with growing or diverse product lines often benefit from combining contract manufacturing and co-packing to optimize flexibility, cost, and efficiency. Here are a few scenarios where this hybrid approach makes sense:
Brands selling across different channels—like Amazon, retail, and direct-to-consumer (DTC)—may require varied packaging formats, batch sizes, or regulatory requirements. A contract manufacturer might produce a base product in bulk (like a powder or concentrate), while a co-packer handles final packaging for different SKUs.
Example: A protein powder brand uses a contract manufacturer to produce large batches of flavored protein. For retail, they use a co-packer to fill tubs with custom shrink-wrap labels, while for eCommerce, they use a different co-packer to package single-serve sachets for DTC sales.
Some brands use contract manufacturing for core, year-round products but turn to co-packers for special editions, influencer collaborations, or seasonal gift sets. Co-packers can often accommodate lower MOQs and faster turnaround times for these limited runs.
Example: A beverage brand works with a contract manufacturer for its main SKUs but uses a co-packer to create a holiday sampler box with small bottles and unique packaging.
Brands expanding into new regions or countries may find it cost-effective to work with a domestic contract manufacturer for their main market and a regional co-packer overseas to handle localized packaging or compliance needs.
Example: A supplement brand manufactures bulk product in the U.S. with a contract manufacturer, then ships it to a European co-packer for re-labeling and distribution under EU-compliant packaging.
Startups with in-house R&D teams often develop and test formulations internally, then scale production via a contract manufacturer. Once the product is made, they may ship the bulk product to a co-packer for customized packaging based on order volume or customer segment.
Example: A skincare company develops its serum formula in-house and uses a contract manufacturer to produce it in drums. The bulk serum is then sent to a co-packer who fills glass bottles, applies custom labels, and prepares units for luxury retail and online sales.
Using both types of partners lets brands stay nimble, reduce risk, and tailor their operations to growth stages, channels, and customer needs.
While the terms are often used interchangeably, co-packing vs contract manufacturing represents two different approaches to outsourcing product creation. Co-packing is ideal for brands looking to scale packaging, while contract manufacturing is better suited for those needing full production services.
Understanding the distinction helps you build the right supply chain strategy, reduce risk, and keep your operations lean as you grow.
Need help scaling your brand’s fulfillment and logistics? Contact us! MyFBAPrep partners with fast-growing CPG and eCommerce brands to streamline their supply chain from production to final delivery.